MARTIN A. FLEISCHMAN, APPELLANT,
v.
MARVIN ODELL ADAMS AND CARL C. RISING, APPELLEES
MARTIN A. FLEISCHMAN, APPELLANT,
MARVIN ODELL ADAMS AND CARL C. RISING, APPELLEES
212 So. 2d 88
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1968)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed upon authority of the rules stated in Cloud v. Fallis, Fla.1959, 110 So. 2d 669, and Simpson v. Clay, Fla.App. 1962, 139 So.2d 494.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Lonergan v. Lippman, 406 So. 2d 1124 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)…ppman restore the Sandpiper Hotel building to Lonergan’s possession. It is gone, not into Lippman’s hands but into oblivion, destroyed by an act of government which Lippman was not obliged to prevent at the time it occurred. Thus is Lowman v. Young, 212 So. 2d 88 (Fla.1st DCA 1968) distinguished; the subject property was in existence and capable of being restored to the prevailing party. At the time the City of Jacksonville Beach razed the Sandpiper building, an expenditure of $60,000 was necessary to preser…1 / 2
Authorities Cited
- Cloud v. Fallis, 110 So. 2d 669 (Fla. 1959)
- Simpson v. Clay, 139 So. 2d 494 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962)