LEVISON

v.

LEVISON

Citator

Cited By

• McCLESKEY v. Kemp, 753 F.2d 877 (11th Cir. 1985)
  …g Corp., 429 U.S. 252, 266 n. 13, 97 S.Ct. 555, 564 n. 13, 50 L.Ed.2d 450 (1977). This Court has confronted the same problem in an analogous setting. In Searcy v. Williams, 656 F. 2d 1003, 1008-09 (5th Cir.1981), aff’d sub nom. Hightower v. Searcy, 455 U.S. 984,102 S.Ct. 1605, 71 L.Ed.2d 844 (1982), the court overturned a facially valid procedure for selecting school board members because the selections fell into an overwhelming pattern of racial imbalance. The decision rested in part on the discretion inh…
• Jones v. The United States, 801 F.2d 1334 (Fed. Cir. 1986)
  …ty claim under the Quiet Title Act); Loesch v. United States, 227 Ct.Cl. 34, 645 F. 2d 905, 924 (1981) (statute of limitations applied to Fifth Amendment taking claim), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1099, 102 S.Ct. 672, 70 L.Ed.2d 640 (1981), reh’g denied, 455 U.S. 984, 102 S.Ct. 1496, 71 L.Ed.2d 695 (1982). The statute of limitations begins to run, by its terms, when a claim accrues. Generally, an action for breach of fiduciary duty accrues when the trust beneficiary knew or should have known of the breach. Meno…
• Darius Irby v. Va. State Bd. OF Elections, 889 F.2d 1352 (4th Cir. 1989)
  …2 is inapplicable. The few courts that have addressed the issue have found Section 2 inapplicable to appointive offices. Searcy v. Williams, 656 F. 2d 1003, 1010 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981) (school board), aff'd without op. sub nom. Hightower v. Searcy, 455 U.S. 984, 102 S.Ct. 1605, 71 L.Ed.2d 844 (1982); Williams v. State Board of Elections, 696 F.Supp. 1563, 1568-69 (N.D.Ill.1988) (state circuit judges). See also Dillard v. Crenshaw County, 831 F. 2d 246, 251 n. 12 (11th Cir.1987). Nonetheless, we will refra…