UNITED STATES

v.

CLARK ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Juzwin v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd., 900 F.2d 686 (3d Cir. 1990)
  …e is not confined to providing relief when service is impossible. Even where absent residents could be served outside the State, the statute still provides for tolling.” Velmohos v. Maren Eng’g Corp., 83 N.J. 282, 416 A. 2d 372, 380 (1980), vacated, 455 U.S. 985, 102 S.Ct. 1605, 71 L.Ed.2d 844 (1982). We think New Jersey’s legitimate interest could adequately be protected by a statute that permits a court to order the statute of limitations to be tolled when it is satisfied that, in spite of diligent effort…

  ← 1 / 3 →