NORTH DAKOTA

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• North Dakota v. United States, 460 U.S. 300 (U.S. 1983)
  …e District Court granted summary judgment for the United States, App. to Juris. Statement 16a, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed. 650 F. 2d 911 (1981).11 We noted probable jurisdiction over North Dakota’s appeal. 455 U. S. 987 (1982). II The protection of migratory birds has long been recognized as “a national interest of very nearly the first magnitude.” Missouri v. Holland, 252 U. S. 416, 435 (1920). Since the turn of the century, the Secretaries of Agriculture and of…
• City of Lockhart v. United States, 460 U.S. 125 (U.S. 1983)
  …strength. The United States, which defended the suit below, now agrees with Lockhart that the changes have no retrogressive effect on the voting rights of Mexican-Americans. Cano continues to defend the result below. We noted probable jurisdiction. 455 U. S. 987 (1982). [*131] I — I l — l We consider first the scope of § 5’s coverage in the circumstances of this case. Lockhart concedes that § 5 applies to its electoral changes, and that the addition of two seats to its governing body and the introduction o…