INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA

v.

KEENE CORP. ET AL.; HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY CO. V. KEENE CORP. ET AL.; AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY CO. V. KEENE CORP. ET AL.; AND LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. V. KEENE CORP. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (32 total)

• Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. Holyfield, 490 U.S. 30 (U.S. 1989)
  …(Utah 1986); In re Adoption of Baby Child, 102 N. M. 735, 700 P. 2d 198 (App. 1985); In re Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Action No. S-903, 130 Ariz. 202, 635 P. 2d 187 (App. 1981), cert. denied sub nom. Catholic Social Services of Tucson v. P. C., 455 U. S. 1007 (1982). Because it was unclear whether this case fell within the Court’s appellate jurisdiction, we postponed consideration of our jurisdiction to the hearing on the merits. Pursuant to the version of 28 U. S. C. § 1257(2) applicable to this appe…
• Schering Corp. v. Home Ins. Co., 712 F.2d 4 (2d Cir. 1983)
  …During the pendency of the action a deus ex machina in the form of an opinion of the District of Columbia Circuit persuaded Schering to modify its theory. In Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North America, 667 F. 2d 1034 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007,102 S.Ct. 1644, 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982), the court construed CGL policies similar to the ones issued by Home, albeit in the context of asbestos-related diseases rather than synthetic estrogens. Keene concluded the CGL language requires indemnification…
• Bell v. Watkins, 692 F.2d 999 (5th Cir. 1982)
  …at her beliefs would affect her decision. We were concerned that further questioning might well have revealed that she could have laid aside her views and obeyed the law. Similarly, in Granviel v. Estelle, 655 F. 2d 673 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007, 102 S.Ct. 1644, 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982), a juror stated that he did not “think” he could vote for the death penalty. In response to the question, “You just don’t feel like you would be entitled to take another person’s life in that fashion?”, he stat…