JOINT APPRENTICESHIP COMMITTEE LOCAL NO. 130, U. A.

v.

EGGLESTON ET AL.; PLUMBING CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION OF CHICAGO AND COOK COUNTY V. PLUMMER ET AL.; AND CHICAGO JOURNEYMEN PLUMBERS' LOCAL UNION NO. 130, U. A. V. PLUMMER ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (60 total)

• In re Japanese Elec. Prods. Antitrust Litig. (D.C. MDL No. 189). Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co., Ltd., 723 F.2d 238 (3d Cir. 1983)
  …to reconsideration of a summary judgment on other grounds. We note, however, that a primary line Robinson-Patman Act claim involves factually complex issues. See generally O. Hommell Co. v. Ferro Corp., 659 F. 2d 340 (3rd Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1017, 102 S.Ct. 1711, 72 L.Ed.2d 134 (1982). D. Zenith’s Clayton Act Section 7 Claim Zenith asserts that the acquisition by MEI in 1974 of Motorola’s Consumer Products Division and its trademark “Quasar,” and Sanyo’s acquisition in 1976 of Warwick Elec…
• MCI Commc'ns Corp. & MCI Telecomms. Corp. v. Am. Tel. & Tel. Co., 708 F.2d 1081 (7th Cir. 1983)
  …ietta Corp., 615 F. 2d 427 (7th Cir.1980); Borden, Inc. v. FTC, 674 F. 2d 498, 515 (6th Cir.1982), petition for cert. filed, 51 U.S.L.W. 3271 (U.S. Aug. 25, 1982) (No. 82-328); O. Hommel Co. v. Ferro Corp., 659 F. 2d 340 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1017, 102 S.Ct. 1711, 72 L.Ed.2d 134 (1982); Americana Industries v. Wometco de Puerto Rico, Inc., 556 F. 2d 625 (1st Cir.1977); International Air Industries v. American Excelsior Co., 517 F. 2d 714 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 943, 96 S.Ct. 14…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• The Avoyelles Sportsmen's League, Inc. v. Marsh, 715 F.2d 897 (5th Cir. 1983)
  …v. Allard, 444 U.S. 51, 100 S.Ct. 318, 62 L.Ed.2d 210 (1979); Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City, 438 U.S. 104, 123, 98 S.Ct. 2646, 2659, 57 L.Ed.2d 631 (1978); Deltona Corp. v. United States, 657 F. 2d 1184 (Ct.Cl.1981), cert, denied, 455 U.S. 1017, 102 S.Ct. 1712, 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982). While we agree with the district court that there has as yet been no taking, we hold that the claim should have been dismissed because it was premature. Like the landowners here, the defendant landowner in…