SALKIN ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (73 total)

• Blair v. State, 698 So. 2d 1210 (Fla. 1997)
  …,”12 , id. at 839, about Blair’s choice to “take the five” jurors, especially after the judge had defense counsel repeat in open court what he had said to Blair privately. See United States v. Page, 661 F. 2d 1080, 1083 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018, 102 S.Ct. 1713, 72 L.Ed.2d 136 (1982) (affirming trial court’s acceptance of defense counsel’s assurances that defendant wished to waive jury trial after lengthy consultation); United States u Agee, 83 F. 3d 882, 886 n. 5 (7th Cir.1996) (explaining…
• Carib Ocean Shipping, Inc. v. Armas, 854 So. 2d 234 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)
  …sought should, as the rules require, be “freely given.”); Heyl & Patterson Int’l, Inc. v. F.D. Rich Housing of Virgin Islands, Inc., 663 F. 2d 419 (3d Cir.l981)(delay in and of itself insufficient basis for denial of motion to amend), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018, 102 S.Ct. 1714, 72 L.Ed.2d 136 (1982); Butcher & Singer, Inc. v. Kellam, 105 F.R.D. 450, 453 (D.Del.l984)(delay in permitting amendment of answer “insignificant when measured against ... interest in seeing a proper decision on the merits”); see Chi…
• MCI Commc'ns Corp. & MCI Telecomms. Corp. v. Am. Tel. & Tel. Co., 708 F.2d 1081 (7th Cir. 1983)
  …idance in the record, we cannot permit a jury to speculate concerning the amount of losses resulting from unlawful, as opposed to lawful, competition. Id. at 1353. See also Murphy Tugboat Co. v. Crowley, 658 F. 2d 1256 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1018, 102 S.Ct. 1713, 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982); Van Dyk Research Corp. v. Xerox Corp., 631 F. 2d 251, 255 (3d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 905, 101 S.Ct. 3029, 69 L.Ed.2d 405 (1981). Coleman Motor was followed in a well-reasoned district court opinion…