TAYLOR

v.

VIRGINIA

Citator

Cited By

• Donovan v. Est. OF Frank E. Fitzsimmons, 778 F.2d 298 (7th Cir. 1985)
  …takes exception to each of these findings, these findings and the ultimate finding of privity are questions of fact, and thus will be upheld unless clearly erroneous. Vulcan, Inc. v. Fordees Corp., 658 F. 2d 1106, 1109 (6th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 906, 102 S.Ct. 1752, 72 L.Ed.2d 162 (1982); Astron Industrial Associates, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corp., 405 F. 2d 958, 960-61 (5th Cir.1968). We have little difficulty in this case upholding the district court’s privity findings. There can be no dispu…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• Morrissey v. Welsh Co., 821 F.2d 1294 (8th Cir. 1987)
  …arding damages. Cannada v. Moore, 578 S.W. 2d 597, 604 (Mo.1979). The ultimate test is what fairly and reasonably compensates the plaintiff for the injuries sustained. Coulter v. Michelin Tire Corp., 622 S.W. 2d 421, 436 (Mo.App.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 906, 102 S.Ct. 1752, 72 L.Ed.2d 162 (1982). Under Missouri law, damages are permitted in wrongful death actions as follows: In every action brought under section 537.080, the trier of the facts may give to the party or parties entitled thereto such da…
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Donna-Lee Sportswear Co., Inc., 836 F.2d 31 (1st Cir. 1987)
  …een two or more persons is such that a judgment involving one of them may justly be conclusive upon the others, although those others were not party to the lawsuit.”); Vulcan, Inc. v. Fordees Corp., 658 F. 2d 1106, 1109 (6th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 906, 102 S.Ct. 1752, 72 L.Ed.2d 162 (1982); Bruszewski v. United States, 181 F. 2d 419, 423 (3d Cir.) (Goodrich, J., concurring) (“It [privity] is merely a word used to say that the relationship between the one who is a party on the record and another i…