COMMUNITY TELEVISION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA

v.

GOTTFRIED ET AL.; AND FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION V. GOTTFRIED ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. United States, 460 U.S. 190 (U.S. 1983)
  …75). The court recognized, however, that its holding was contrary to that reached in Wallenius Bremen G. m. b. H. v. United [*193] States, 409 F. 2d 994 (CA4 1969), cert. denied, 398 U. S. 958 (1970).3 We granted certiorari to resolve the conflict. 456 U. S. 913 (1982). We now reverse. M I — l Section 8116(c) is specific and detailed. It prohibits actions against the United States by an “employee, his legal representative, spouse, dependents, next of kin, [or] any other person otherwise entitled to recove…
• Araujo v. Woods Hole, 693 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1982)
  …t it believes NET played a role in causing. Such a theory “turns indemnity on its head.” Santisteven v. Dow Chemical Co., 506 F. 2d 1216, 1219 (9th Cir.1974). See Thomas v. Lockheed Aircraft Corp., 665 F. 2d 1330, 1333 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. granted, 456 U.S. 913, 102 S.Ct. 1766, 72 L.Ed.2d 172 (1982). Rather, a contractual right to indemnification will only be implied when there are unique special factors demonstrating that the parties intended that the would-be indemnitor bear the ultimate responsibility f…
• Xerox Corp. v. Cnty. of Harris, 459 U.S. 145 (U.S. 1982)
  …f $131,311 plus penalties and interest to Harris County and $156,728 plus penalties and interest to the city of Houston. The Texas Supreme Court denied Xerox’s application for a writ of error and this appeal followed. We noted probable jurisdiction, 456 U. S. 913 (1982), and we reverse. h-1 I — H A A preliminary question is whether this Court has jurisdiction over the appeal. Appellees argue that this Court lacks jurisdiction since the decision of the Texas court reversing the grant of an injunction reste…