RIDEN

v.

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Citator

Cited By (18 total)

• Liteky v. United States, 510 U.S. 540 (U.S. 1994)
  …); United States v. Sibla, 624 F. 2d 864, 869 (CA9 1980). Some, however, have agreed with it, see United States v. Chantal, 902 F. 2d 1018, 1023-1024 (CA1 1990); cf. United States v. Coven, 662 F. 2d 162, 168-169 (CA2 1981) (semble), cert. denied, 456 U. S. 916 (1982). To understand the arguments pro and. con it is necessary to appreciate the major changes in prior law effected by the revision of § 455 in 1974. Before 1974, § 455 was nothing more than the then-current version of the 1821 prohibition aga…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Porter, 764 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1985)
  …bridged his sixth amendment right to confrontation. The confrontation clause does not come into play where a potential witness neither testifies nor provides evidence at trial. United States v. Coven, 662 F. 2d 162, 170 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 916, 102 S.Ct. 1771, 72 L.Ed.2d 176 (1982); Mcallister v. Brown, 555 F. 2d 1277 (5th Cir.1977); Houser v. United States, 508 F. 2d 509, 518 (8th Cir.1974); Turnbough v. Wyrick, 420 F.Supp. 588 (E.D.Mo. [*10] 1976) , affirmed, 551 F. 2d 202 (8th Cir. 197…
• Katsaros v. Cody, 744 F.2d 270 (2d Cir. 1984)
  …ejudice based on personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts is required if that “[ijnformation or knowledge possessed by a judge ... stem[s] from an extrajudicial source.” United States v. Coven, 662 F. 2d 162, 168 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 916, 102 S.Ct. 1771, 72 L.Ed.2d 176 (1982). “Knowledge acquired by a judge while he performs judicial duties does not constitute grounds for disqualification.” Id. Here the information forming the basis of the bias claim came to Judge Mishler’s attentio…