LEE

v.

UNITED STATES; AND NANCE V. UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (55 total)

• California v. Carney, 471 U.S. 386 (U.S. 1985)
  …6 Judicature 177, 182 (1982). Pet. for Cert. 15-17, 21, 24-25. The petition acknowledged that the decision below was consistent with dictum in two recent Ninth Circuit decisions. See United States v. Wiga, 662 F. 2d 1325, 1329 (1981), cert. denied, 456 U. S. 918 (1982); United States v. Williams, 630 F. 2d 1322, 1326, cert. denied, 449 U. S. 865 (1980). Only one case contained any reference to heightened expectations of privacy in mobile living quarters. United States v. Cadena, 588 F. 2d 100, 101-102 (CA5…
• William R. Milburn and Richard v. Thompson, 734 F.2d 762 (11th Cir. 1984)
  …reasons in support of a presumed action on the summary judgment motion. In a supplemental brief filed after hearing, the government cites Local Rule 10 J2, Kilbort v. Hampton, supra, and Howell v. Tanner, 650 F. 2d 610 (5th Cir.1981) cert. denied, 456 U.S. 918, 102 S.Ct. 1775, 72 L.Ed.2d 178, for the proposition that Mil-burn and Thompson, having had an opportunity to submit materials in opposition, should be considered as having received “constructive notice” under Rule 56. The proposition cannot be here…
• Robinson v. Giarmarco & Bill, P.C., 74 F.3d 253 (11th Cir. 1996)
  …. v. Washington Mills Abrasive Co., 840 F. 2d 843, 845 (11th Cir.1988). The district court’s refusal to change venue will only be disturbed for a clear abuse of discretion. Howell v. Tanner, 650 F. 2d 610, 616 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 918, 102 S.Ct. 1775, 72 L.Ed.2d 178 (1982). We review denial of a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction de novo. Cable/Home Communication Corp. v. Network Productions, Inc., 902 F. 2d 829, 855 (11th Cir.1990). When no evidentiary hearin…