CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, N.A.

v.

VISHIPCO LINE ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Shaw v. DELTA AIR Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 (U.S. 1983)
  …hich case ERISA regulation would be exclusive. Because courts have disagreed about the scope of ERISA’s pre-emption provisions,12 and because of the continuing importance of the issues presented,13 we noted probable jurisdiction in all three cases. 456 U. S. 924 (1982). HH I — i l-H In deciding whether a federal law pre-empts a state statute, our task is to ascertain Congress’ intent in enacting the federal statute at issue. “Pre-emption may be either express or implied, and ‘is compelled whether Congress…
• Smith v. Wade, 461 U.S. 30 (U.S. 1983)
  …Justice Brennan delivered the opinion of the Court. We granted certiorari in this case, 456 U. S. 924 (1982), to decide whether the District Court for the Western District of Missouri applied the correct legal standard in instructing the jury that it might award punitive damages under 42 U. S. C. §1983 (1976 ed., Supp. V).1 The Court of Appeals for…
• McCANN v. Coughlin, 698 F.2d 112 (2d Cir. 1983)
  …. Desmond, 572 F. 2d 102, 106 (3rd Cir.1978); Woods-Drake v. Lundy, 667 F. 2d 1198, 1203 (5th Cir.1982); Wade v. Haynes, 663 F. 2d 778, 786 (8th Cir.1981) (malice inferred from “reckless and callous disregard”), cert. granted sub nom. Smith v. Wade, 456 U.S. 924, 102 S.Ct. 1968, 72 L.Ed.2d 439 (1982); Phiffer v. Proud Parrot Motor Hotel, Inc., 648 F. 2d 548, 553 (9th Cir.1980); Silver v. Cormier, 529 F. 2d 161 (10th Cir.1976). The First, Fourth, Sixth and Seventh Circuits require a showing of malice before…