SCHMEDT

v.

DE BACA ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (76 total)

• State v. Clausell, 474 So. 2d 1189 (Fla. 1985)
  …2d 367 (1977); McKenzie v. State, 507 P. 2d 1333 (Okla.1973); State v. Koller, 87 Wis.2d 253, 274 N.W. 2d 651 (1979). See also United States v. Hubbard, 493 F.Supp. 206 (D.D.C.1979), aff'd, U.S. v. Heldt, 668 F. 2d 1238 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 926, 102 S.Ct. 1971, 72 L.Ed.2d 440 (1982) (fact that member of United States Attorney’s office has disqualifying interest does not preclude entire office from prosecuting case); State v. Schade, 584 S.W. 2d 635 (Mo.1979) (permissible for assistant stat…
• Honorable William Meggs v. The Honorable Charles McCLURE, 538 So. 2d 518 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)
  …require disqualification of one of his assistants, citing State v. Fitzpatrick, 464 So. 2d 1185 (Fla.1985). Further, in U.S. v. Hubbard, 493 F.Supp. 206, 208 (D.D.C.1979), aff'd. sub. nom., U.S. v. Heldt, 668 F. 2d 1238 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 926, 102 S.Ct. 1971, 72 L.Ed.2d 440 (1982), cited with approval, Clausell v. State, supra, the court held that an office of a U.S. attorney need not be disqualified because two members of that office were to testify at trial. The court stated that all m…
• Hoyas v. State, 456 So. 2d 1225 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)
  …of its principle.” Anderson v. State, 297 So. 2d 871, 872 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974), quoting from 8 Wigmore, Evidence, supra, § 2291. See also State v. Sandini, 395 So. 2d 1178 (Fla. 4th DCA), pet. for rev. denied, 408 So. 2d 1095 (Fla.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 926, 102 S.Ct. 1971, 72 L.Ed.2d 440 (1982). We assume, for the sake of argument, that the initial communication in question does not fall within the exception to confidentiality for a communication which is intended [when made] by the client to be disc…