COTTON PETROLEUM CORP.

v.

EDWARDS, SECRETARY OF ENERGY, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (39 total)

• United States v. Johnson, 713 F.2d 633 (11th Cir. 1983)
  …ercise of diligence, the grounds therefor, whichever is earlier.” 28 U.S.C. § 1867(a). That timeliness requirement was intended to be strictly enforced. See, e.g., United States v. Bearden, 659 F. 2d 590, 600 (5th Cir.1981) (Unit B), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 936, 102 S.Ct. 1993, 72 L.Ed.2d 456 (1982). “Where a defendant relies on a jury challenge motion filed by another defendant, the seven-day period provided in the Act for filing a motion begins to run from the date the defendant has knowledge or could ha…
• United States v. E.A. Gregory, 730 F.2d 692 (11th Cir. 1984)
  …he defects which the defendants point to are technical deviations from the Act and the local plan____” This Court recently construed the Jury Selection and Service Act in United States v. Bearden, 659 F. 2d 590 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 936, 102 S.Ct. 1993, 72 L.Ed.2d 456 (1982). In Bearden, the clerk had violated the Act or local plan by selecting the starting number arbitrarily rather than randomly, by failing to post [*699] public notices of selection procedures, and by improperly e…
• United States v. Miller, 771 F.2d 1219 (9th Cir. 1985)
  …Cir.1981) (although statistically nonrandom methods were used to select jurors from pool, their use did not constitute a substantial violation of the Act so long as selection method did not discriminate against individuals or groups), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 936, 102 S.Ct. 1993, 72 L.Ed.2d 456 (1982). Finally, appellants’ allegation that some women were improperly excused for the entire term of court when they requested only temporary excusáis due to pregnancy or nursing responsibilities, if true, constitu…