BAKER ET AL.
v.
AMSTED INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL.
BAKER ET AL.
AMSTED INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL.
456 U.S. 945
Supreme Court of the United States (1982)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
J.K. Watts v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 796 F.2d 1240 (10th Cir. 1986)…Major disputes involving changes in working conditions are within the jurisdiction of the National Mediation Board. 45 U.S.C. § 155 First (a); St. Louis S.W. Ry. Co. v. Brotherhood of R.R. Signalmen, 665 F. 2d 987, 990 (10th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 945, 102 S.Ct. 2011, 72 L.Ed.2d 467 (1982). Appellant contends that the application of Rule 700 to his conviction for off duty drug possession constitutes a major change in working conditions. He notes that the rule had not been applied to off duty dru…
-
Musicians Union OF LAS Vegas, Local NO. 369, AFM, AFL-CIO v. DEL E. Webb Corp. & its subsidiary, 736 F.2d 1388 (9th Cir. 1984)…court’s ruling, a member of the union cannot contract away benefits secured by the collective bargaining agreement. J.I. Case, 321 U.S. at 336, 64 S.Ct. at 579; Baker v. Amsted Industries, Inc., 656 F. 2d 1245, 1248-49 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 945, 102 S.Ct. 2011, 72 L.Ed.2d 468 (1982). The district court relied on Alpha Beta Co. v. Retail Store Employees Union Local m, 671 F. 2d 1247 (9th Cir.1982). However, that case is clearly inapposite. Alpha Beta held that, because the union did not a…