BAKER ET AL.
v.
AMSTED INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL.

U.S. | 1982-04-26
No. 81-1624
456 U.S. 945 Supreme Court of the United States (1982) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • J.K. Watts v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 796 F.2d 1240 (10th Cir. 1986)
    …Major disputes involving changes in working conditions are within the jurisdiction of the National Mediation Board. 45 U.S.C. § 155 First (a); St. Louis S.W. Ry. Co. v. Brotherhood of R.R. Signalmen, 665 F. 2d 987, 990 (10th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 945, 102 S.Ct. 2011, 72 L.Ed.2d 467 (1982). Appellant contends that the application of Rule 700 to his conviction for off duty drug possession constitutes a major change in working conditions. He notes that the rule had not been applied to off duty dru…
  • …court’s ruling, a member of the union cannot contract away benefits secured by the collective bargaining agreement. J.I. Case, 321 U.S. at 336, 64 S.Ct. at 579; Baker v. Amsted Industries, Inc., 656 F. 2d 1245, 1248-49 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 945, 102 S.Ct. 2011, 72 L.Ed.2d 468 (1982). The district court relied on Alpha Beta Co. v. Retail Store Employees Union Local m, 671 F. 2d 1247 (9th Cir.1982). However, that case is clearly inapposite. Alpha Beta held that, because the union did not a…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw