LAMOUNTAIN

v.

RAINES

Citator

Cited By

• Barber v. Ponte, 772 F.2d 982 (1st Cir. 1985)
  …rcuits holding that young adults do not have a sufficient community of interest to qualify as a cognizable group. See, e.g., United States v. Potter, 552 F. 2d 901, 905 (9th Cir.1977); Brown v. Harris, 666 F. 2d 782, 784 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 948, 102 S.Ct. 2017, 72 L.Ed.2d 472 (1982). We decline to follow Massachusetts’ argument for several reasons. Although conclusive evidence of the experimental or attitudinal distinctiveness of any group is difficult, if not impossible, to obtain many s…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• United States v. LaCHANCE, 788 F.2d 856 (2d Cir. 1986)
  …purposes. Barber v. Ponte, 772 F. 2d at 996 (September 18, 1985). This court may not have squarely decided the point, but it has “certainly indicated sympathy for the majority view.” Brown v. Harris, 666 F. 2d 782, 784 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 948,102 S.Ct. 2017, 72 L.Ed.2d 472 (1982). We are unable under the circumstances here to find any abuse of discretion by the trial judge in denying the motions to strike the petit jury panel. 2(a) The second argument for John is that the government p…