BRUMMITT

v.

UNITED STATES; AND SCARBOROUGH V. UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (13 total)

• United States v. E.A. Gregory, 730 F.2d 692 (11th Cir. 1984)
  …how a substantial disparity between that group’s representation in the selection process and its representation in the general population. See, e.g., United States v. Brummitt, 665 F. 2d 521, 528-30 (5th Cir.1981) (Hispanic Americans), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 977, 102 S.Ct. 2244, 72 L.Ed.2d 852 (1982); United States v. Hawkins, 661 F. 2d 436, 442-43 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981) (residents of divisions within judicial district), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 991, 102 S.Ct. 2274, 2967, 73 L.Ed.2d 1287 (1982); United States…
• United States v. Esle, 743 F.2d 1465 (11th Cir. 1984)
  …6 (5th Cir.1975). See also United States ex rel. Barksdale v. Blackburn, 639 F. 2d 1115 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1056, 102 S.Ct. 603, 70 L.Ed.2d 593 (1981); United States v. Brummitt, 665 F. 2d 521 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 977, 102 S.Ct. 2244, 72 L.Ed.2d 852 (1982). “[I]t has never been thought that federal juries must be drawn from a cross-section of the total population without the imposition of any qualifications.” United States v. McVean, 436 F. 2d 1120, 1122 (5th Cir…
• United States v. Smith, 757 F.2d 1161 (11th Cir. 1985)
  …s upon which the prosecution builds its case, United States v. Nicoll, 664 F. 2d 1308 (5th Cir. Unit B), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1118, 102 S.Ct. 2929, 73 L.Ed.2d 1330 (1982); United States v. Crossman, 663 F. 2d 607, 610 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 977, 102 S.Ct. 2243, 72 L.Ed.2d 851 (1982); United States v. Brooks, 611 F. 2d 614, 618 (5th Cir.1980); United States v. Williamson, 482 F. 2d 508, 515 (5th Cir.1973); Government of the Canal Zone v. Risbrook, 454 F. 2d 725 (5th Cir.1972); McCarty v. Un…