RICHARDS

v.

NEW YORK

Citator

Cited By (17 total)

• United States v. Troutman, 814 F.2d 1428 (10th Cir. 1987)
  …d States, 9 Cir., 327 F. 2d 825, 832, cert. denied, 377 U.S. 970, 84 S.Ct. 1652, 12 L.Ed.2d 739. ‘No right of a defendant is violated when a potential witness freely chooses not to talk____’ Kines v. Butterworth, 1 Cir. 669 F. 2d 6, 9, cert. denied, 456 U.S. 980, 102 S.Ct. 2250 72 L.Ed.2d 856. However, the prosecution may not interfere with the free choice of a witness to speak with the defense absent justification ‘by the clearest and most compelling considerations.’ Id. In the case at bar the prosecution…
• United States v. Bryceson Pinto, 755 F.2d 150 (10th Cir. 1985)
  …ed States, 9 Cir., 327 F. 2d 825, 832, cert. denied 377 U.S. 970, 84 S.Ct. 1652, 12 L.Ed.2d 739. “No right of a defendant is violated when a potential' witness freely choses not to talk____” Kines v. Butterworth, 1 Cir., 669 F. 2d 6, 9, cert. denied 456 U.S. 980, 102 S.Ct. 2250, 72 L.Ed.2d 856. However, the prosecution may not interfere with the free choice of a witness to speak with the defense absent justification “by the clearest and most compelling considerations.” Id. In the case at bar the prosecution…
• United States v. Arboleda, 929 F.2d 858 (1st Cir. 1991)
  …re date?” Sharp answered, “No.” “The equal right of the prosecution and the defense in criminal proceedings to interview witnesses before trial is clearly recognized by the courts.” Kines v. Butterworth, 669 F. 2d 6, 9 (1st Gir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 980, 102 S.Ct. 2250, 72 L.Ed.2d 856 (1982). Although unjustifiable government interference with a defendant’s right of access to a witness is improper, “[n]o right of a defendant is violated when a potential witness freely chooses not to talk....” Id. U…

  ← 1 / 2 →