RHODES

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (28 total)

• The Clorox Co. v. The United States Dist. Court FOR the N. Dist. OF Cal., 779 F.2d 517 (9th Cir. 1985)
  …hat will be employed only in extreme situations. Kerr v. United States District Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402, 96 S.Ct. 2119, 2123, 48 L.Ed.2d 725 (1976); Sacramento Bee v. United States District Court, 656 F. 2d 477, 480-81 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 983, 102 S.Ct. 2257, 72 L.Ed.2d 861 (1982). Extraordinary review by mandamus is not available when the same review may be obtained through contemporaneous ordinary appeal. See Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp., 460 U.S. 1, 8…
• United States v. Sherlock, 962 F.2d 1349 (9th Cir. 1989)
  …er the First Amendment. See, e.g., Press Enterprise, 464 U.S. at 510, 104 S.Ct. at 824; United States v. Brooklier, 685 F. 2d 1162, 1167-68 (9th Cir.1982); Sacramento Bee v. United States Dist. Court, 656 F. 2d 477, 482 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 983, 102 S.Ct. 2257, 72 L.Ed.2d 861 (1982). Any doubt about whether procedural protections would apply in the Sixth Amendment context was resolved by Waller, where the Court stated: [TJhere can be little doubt that the explicit Sixth Amendment right of…
• Coleen R. Roberts v. Coll. OF THE Desert, 870 F.2d 1411 (9th Cir. 1988)
  …d by the jury); Blake v. Hall, 668 F. 2d 52, 54 (1st Cir.1981) (trial judge not bound by the jury verdict in deciding whether to grant equitable relief because there was no way to determine what common issues were decided by the jury), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 983, 102 S.Ct. 2257, 72 L.Ed.2d 862 (1982). B. Substantial Evidence In reviewing a court’s ultimate determination on a Title VII claim, this court applies the clearly erroneous standard because the determination is essentially a factual one. Atonio v.…