HUNTER
v.
NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL SERVICE
HUNTER
NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL SERVICE
456 U.S. 985
Supreme Court of the United States (1982)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Hammond, 726 F.2d 483 (9th Cir. 1984)…ied to foreign vessels without adverse results on international trade and has been held not to intrude on the constitutional treaty-making powers of the United States. Lake Carriers’ Ass’n v. Kelley, 527 F.Supp. 1114, 1130-31 (E.D.Mich.1981), aff’d, 456 U.S. 985, 102 S.Ct. 2264, 73 L.Ed.2d 1280 (1982). We note in passing that in section 1322 Congress carved out an area of regulation otherwise covered by the NPDES permit system, including applicable state standards, and placed part of it within the exclusiv…
-
United States v. State OF Mich., 851 F.2d 803 (6th Cir. 1988)…directly rather than absorb the cost as a business expense and pass on the tax indirectly.5 In United States v. California State Board of Equalization, 650 F. 2d 1127 (9th Cir.1981), aff'd, 456 U.S. 901, 102 S.Ct. 1744, 72 L.Ed. 2d 157 reh’g denied, 456 U.S. 985, 102 S.Ct. 2261, 72 L.Ed.2d 864 (1982), the court concluded that this kind of economic incentive for the seller to pass a sales tax directly on to a purchaser was sufficient to cause the legal incidence of the tax to be on the purchaser, even though…
-
Bass River Assocs. v. The Mayor, 743 F.2d 159 (3d Cir. 1984)…(standards for surface mining effluents). Furthermore, the purposes of the federal Act and of Ordinance 83-1 are consistent. See Lake Carriers’ Association v. Kelley, 527 F.Supp. 1114, 1122 (E.D.Mich.1981) (three-judge court), aff'd without opinion, 456 U.S. 985, 102 S.Ct. 2264, 73 L.Ed.2d 1280 (1982). Thus we find little doubt about the policy evinced by section 1370, and no merit in the appellants’ contention that “Congress has left no room for state supplementation.” Brief of Appellants at 15. Nor do we…