KRAMER

v.

ABRAMS, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW YORK

Citator

Cited By

• Georgevich v. Judge Samuel Strauss, 772 F.2d 1078 (3d Cir. 1985)
  …ntiffs the relief they seek is at least an “unsettled question of state law, the resolution of which would affect the decision of a federal constitutional issue,” Heritage Farms, Inc. v. Solebury Township, 671 F. 2d 743, 746 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 990, 102 S.Ct. 2270, 73 L.Ed.2d 1285 (1982), and that therefore abstention is required under the doctrine of Railroad Commission of Texas v. Pullman Co., 312 U.S. 496, 61 S.Ct. 643, 85 L.Ed.2d 971 (1941). The extent of the parties’ agreement as to the…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Interdynamics, Inc. v. Firma Wolf, 698 F.2d 157 (3d Cir. 1982)
  …facturing Co. v. Berwick Industries, Inc., 532 F. 2d 330, 332-33 (3d Cir.1976). See Devex Corp. v. General Motors Corp., 667 F. 2d 347, 359 (3d Cir.1981) (two cases), cert. granted, 456 U.S. 988, 102 S.Ct. 2267, 73 L.Ed.2d 1283 (1982), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 990, 102 S.Ct. 2270, 73 L.Ed.2d 1285 (1982); Hadco Products, Inc. v. Frank Dini Co., 401 F. 2d 462, 464 (3d Cir.1968). The Supreme Court has proclaimed that [a] finding of equivalence is a determination of fact .... Like any other issue of fact, final…
• Pace Res., Inc. v. Shrewsbury Twp., 808 F.2d 1023 (3d Cir. 1987)
  …is no allegation that the regulators acted for personal financial gain.1 Accordingly, this case is far re [*1027] moved from the situation that this Court faced in Heritage Farms, Inc. v. Solebury Township, 671 F. 2d 743 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 990, 102 S.Ct. 2270, 73 L.Ed.2d 1285 (1982) (allegations that public officials conspired to put plaintiff out of business for private reasons applicable only to him state civil rights claim under due process clause). Finally, Pace’s broad, conclusory a…