ROMIEH

v.

REAGAN, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Lewis, 759 F.2d 1316 (8th Cir. 1985)
  …5), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1052, 96 S.Ct. 780, 46 L.Ed.2d 641 (1976). The trial judge is vested with discretion to determine whether the exhibits shall be sent to the jury. United States v. Wilson, 665 F. 2d 825, 829-30 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 994, 102 S.Ct. 2279, 73 L.Ed.2d 1291 (1982). The financial transactions summarized in this case appear to be supported by the evidence and the exhibits themselves do not appear to have taken on undue significance at trial. Cf. Baines v. United States,…
• United States v. Robinson, 774 F.2d 261 (8th Cir. 1985)
  …district court has considerable discretion in determining whether to send exhibits to the jury. See, e.g., United States v. Lewis, 759 F. 2d 1316, 1329 n. 6 (8th Cir.1985); United States v. Wilson, 665 F. 2d 825, 829-30 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 994, 102 S.Ct. 2279, 73 L.Ed.2d 1291 (1982); United States v. John Bernard Industries, 589 F. 2d 1353, 1359-60 (8th Cir.1979). We will not reverse the district [*276] court’s determination on appeal unless it has abused its discretion. We find no abuse…
• United States v. Smith, 757 F.2d 1161 (11th Cir. 1985)
  …III. Sufficiency of Conspiracy Evidence Smith was convicted of conspiracy to distribute cocaine. He points out that a defendant may not conspire with government agents, United States v. Tombrello, 666 F. 2d 485, 490 n. 3 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 994, 102 S.Ct. 2279, 73 L.Ed.2d 1291 (1982), and then makes two claims: first, that the grand jury did not have any competent evidence upon which to base an indictment for conspiracy and, second, that the evidence at trial of a conspiracy with persons o…