ENGLE, CORRECTIONAL SUPERINTENDENT

v.

ISAAC; PERINI, CORRECTIONAL SUPERINTENDENT V. BELL; AND ENGLE, CORRECTIONAL SUPERINTENDENT V. HUGHES

Citator

Cited By (18 total)

• Hoover v. State, 511 So. 2d 629 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)
  …only in the rare cases where the interests of justice present a compelling demand for its application. We find such a demand presented in the case before us. See also United States v. Frady, 456 U.S. 152, 102 S.Ct. 1584, 71 L.Ed.2d 816, reh. den., 456 U.S. 1001, 102 S.Ct. 2287, 73 L.Ed.2d 1296 (1982), error "so ‘plain’ that the trial judge and prosecutor were derelict in countenancing it, even absent the defendant’s timely assistance in detecting it”; Screws v. United States, 325 U.S. 91, 65 S.Ct. 1031, 89…
• Cate v. Oldham, 707 F.2d 1176 (11th Cir. 1983)
  …rst Amendment rights is shown, some federal courts have held that irreparable injury justifying preliminary injunctive relief is presumed. Community Communications Co., Inc. v. City of Boulder, Colo., 660 F. 2d 1370 (10th Cir.1981), cert. dismissed, 456 U.S. 1001, 102 S.Ct. 2287, 73 L.Ed.2d 1296 (1982).…
• Knight v. Dugger, 863 F.2d 705 (11th Cir. 1988)
  …tion to prosecutorial comments is made at trial or raised on direct appeal, a federal court will usually be barred from reviewing a claim of error based thereon. See generally Engle v. Isaac, 456 U.S. 107, 71 L.Ed.2d 783, 102 S.Ct. 1558, reh. den., [456 U.S. 1001] 73 L.Ed.2d 1296, 102 S.Ct. 2283 [2286] reh. den. [457 U.S. 1141] 73 L.Ed.2d 1361, 102 S.Ct. 2976 (1982); United States v. Frady, 456 U.S. 152, 71 L.Ed.2d 816, 102 S.Ct. 1584 (1982); Wainwright v. Sykes, 433 U.S. 72 [53 L.Ed.2d 594] 97 S.Ct. 2497 (1…