KRAFT, INC.

v.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CITRUS

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

• Dep't OF Ins. v. Se. Volusia Hosp. Dist., 438 So. 2d 815 (Fla. 1983)
  …Fla.1973). It is the power to say what the law is that is prohibited from being delegated. Coca-Cola Co., Food Division v. State, Department of Citrus, 406 So. 2d 1079 (Fla.1981), appeal dismissed sub nom Kraft, Inc. v. Florida Department of Citrus, 456 U.S. 1002, 102 S.Ct. 2288, 73 L.Ed.2d 1297 (1982); Rosslow v. State, 401 So. 2d 1107 (Fla.1981). The fifth area of the statute attacked by the district court for an obvious absence of standards and guidelines is the portion of section 768.54(3)(c) which deal…
• State v. Salvadore Saiez, 489 So. 2d 1125 (Fla. 1986)
  …s on such interference. State v. Leone, 118 So. 2d 781, 784 (Fla.1960). See also Coca-Cola Co., Food Division v. State, Department of Citrus, 406 So. 2d 1079, 1084-85 (Fla.1981), appeal dismissed sub nom. Kraft, Inc. v. Florida Department of Citrus, 456 U.S. 1002, 102 S.Ct. 2288, 73 L.Ed.2d 1297 (1982); State ex rel. Walters v. Blackburn, 104 So. 2d 19 (Fla.1958); Conner v. Sullivan, 160 So. 2d 120, 122 (Fla. 1st DCA 1963), cert. denied, [*1128] 165 So. 2d 176 (Fla.1964). See generally W. LaFave and A. Scott…
• Laurel D. Schutz v. Schutz, 581 So. 2d 1290 (Fla. 1991)
  …ress opinions that she does not hold, a practice disallowed by the first amendment. Coca-Cola Co. v. Department of Citrus, 406 So. 2d 1079, 1087 (Fla.1981) (“the state may never force one to adopt or express a particular opinion”), appeal dismissed, 456 U.S. 1002, 102 S.Ct. 2288, 73 L.Ed.2d 1297 (1982); see Wooley v. Maynard, 430 U.S. 705, 97 S.Ct. 1428, 51 L.Ed.2d 752 (1977) (states’ interest insufficient to outweigh individual’s first amendment right to avoid being courier of state motto); West Virginia St…