MATTHEWS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Desfosses v. Wallace Energy, Inc., 836 F.2d 22 (1st Cir. 1987)
  …ip, reasonableness of terms of the real estate contract, and whether the default was beyond the reasonable control of the franchisee). Cf. Kostantas v. Exxon Co., 663 F. 2d 605 (5th Cir.1981) (franchisee’s death justified termination), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1009, 102 S.Ct. 2302, 73 L.Ed.2d 1305 (1982). Thus, this Court could determine whether it was reasonable for Wallace not to renew the franchise where Desfosses had actual knowledge of the information required by section 2802(c)(4). We do not, however, n…
• Lugar v. Texaco, Inc., 755 F.2d 53 (3d Cir. 1985)
  …ip, reasonableness of terms of the real estate contract, and whether the default was beyond the reasonable control of the franchisee). Cf. Kostantas v. Exxon Co., 663 F. 2d 605 (5th Cir.1981) (franchisee’s death justified termination), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1009, 102 S.Ct. 2302, 73 L.Ed.2d 1305 (1982). However, because we have found that Texaco’s nonrenewal fit within 15 U.S.C. § 2802(c)(4), the court could not evaluate the reasonableness of Texaco’s action under 15 U.S.C. § 2802(b)(2)(C). There is no othe…
• United States v. Farhad Bakhtiar and Anthony McDonald, 994 F.2d 970 (2d Cir. 1993)
  …985 F. 2d 770 (5th Cir.1993) (exception for statements against penal interest not firmly rooted); Olson v. Green, 668 F. 2d 421, 428 (8th Cir.) (custodial statements implicating third party do not fall within firmly rooted exception), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1009, 102 S.Ct. 2303, 73 L.Ed.2d 1305 (1982). But see United States v. York, 933 F. 2d 1343, 1362-64 (7th Cir.) (exception firmly rooted as to statements not made to limit declarant’s exposure), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 321, 116 L.Ed.2d 262 (1…