UNITED STATES

v.

PLACE

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Bankston, 435 So. 2d 269 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
  …525 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981) and State v. Mosier, 392 So. 2d 602 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981) may be in jeopardy are therefore not before us. The issue is, however, now generally before the Court in United States v. Place, 660 F. 2d 44 (2d Cir.1981), cert. granted, 457 U.S. 1104, 102 S.Ct. 2901, 73 L.Ed.2d 1312 (1982) (invalidating two hour detention of personal luggage to arrange dog sniff). . See note 5, supra.…
• United States v. Place, 462 U.S. 696 (U.S. 1983)
  …ed, however, that the prolonged seizure of Place’s baggage exceeded the permissible limits of a Terry-type investigative stop and consequently amounted to a seizure without probable cause in violation of the Fourth Amendment. We granted certiorari, 457 U. S. 1104 (1982), and now affirm. ) — I h — I The Fourth Amendment protects the “right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.” (Emphasis added.) Although in the context of person…
• Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745 (U.S. 1983)
  …kill dissented, stating that the majority had overextended Anders. In his view, Anders concerned only whether an attorney must pursue nonfrivolous appeals; it did not imply that attorneys must advance all nonfrivolous issues. We granted certiorari, 457 U. S. 1104 (1982), and we reverse. II In announcing a new per se rule that appellate counsel must raise every nonfrivolous issue requested by the client,4 [*751] the Court of Appeals relied primarily upon Anders v. California, supra. There is, of course, no…