MID-CAROLINA OIL, INC., ET AL.

v.

KLIPPEL ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (19 total)

• State v. Singleton, 595 So. 2d 44 (Fla. 1992)
  …h the defendant did not have a possessory interest and the seizure of a person by stating: The cases relied upon by the state, United States v. Lanford, 838 F. 2d 1351 (5th Cir.1988); United States v. Hensel, 672 F. 2d 578 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1107, 102 S.Ct. 2907, 73 L.Ed.2d 1316 (1982); and United States v. Hargrove, 647 F. 2d 411 (4th Cir.1981), involve the search and seizure of property in which the defendant had no ownership or possessory interest, therefore the defendant lacked standing…
• Nelson v. State, 578 So. 2d 694 (Fla. 1991)
  …n. State v. Conger, 183 Conn. 386, 390-91, 439 A. 2d 381, 384 (1981) (citations omitted). The cases relied upon by the state, United States v. Lanford, 838 F. 2d 1351 (5th Cir.1988); United States v. Hensel, 672 F. 2d 578 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1107, 102 S.Ct. 2907, 73 L.Ed.2d 1316 (1982); and United States v. Hargrove, 647 F. 2d 411 (4th Cir.1981), involve the search and seizure of property in which the defendant had no ownership or possessory interest, therefore the defendant lacked standing…
• United States v. Haimowitz, 725 F.2d 1561 (11th Cir. 1984)
  …the FBI, controlled the recording equipment. Nevertheless, the court held that the private detective was acting under color of law when he recorded the conversations. See also United States v. Salisbury, 662 F. 2d 738 (11th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1107, 102 S.Ct. 2907, 73 L.Ed.2d 1316 (1982) (defendant did not dispute that informant acted under color of law when informant received and recorded telephone calls); United States v. Tousant, 619 F. 2d 810 (9th Cir.1980) (informant who was apparently op…

  ← 1 / 2 →