KEATING

v.

KEATING, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF KEATING

Citator

Cited By (22 total)

• United States v. Adamo, 742 F.2d 927 (6th Cir. 1984)
  …rned by a legally constituted and unbiased grand jury ... if valid on its face, is enough to call for trial of the charge on the merits.' 350 U.S. at 363 [76 S.Ct. at 409] ...” United States v. Short, 671 F. 2d 178, 182 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1119, 102 S.Ct. 2932, 73 L.Ed.2d 1332 (1982). There is no claim here that the grand jury was not “legally constituted” nor that the indictment returned was not “valid on its face.” The sole claim presented is that the grand jury in this case was made bia…
• Equal Emp. Opportunity Comm'n v. Univ. OF Notre Dame DU LAC, 715 F.2d 331 (7th Cir. 1983)
  …ory” searches will not be condoned. Similarly, the mere fact that certain information may be relevant or useful does not establish a “particularized need” for disclosure of information. United States v. Short, 671 F. 2d 178 (6th Cir.), cert, denied, 457 U.S. 1119, 102 S.Ct. 2932, 73 L.Ed.2d 1332 (1982); Miller Brewing, 687 F. 2d at 1091. The party seeking disclosure of the privileged information must show a “compelling necessity” for the specific information requested. Douglas Oil Co., 441 U.S. at 222-23, 99…
• United States v. Claiborne, 765 F.2d 784 (9th Cir. 1985)
  …privilege against self-incrimination). In so doing, the courts have recognized that such evidentiary challenges are best resolved in the adversary arena of a criminal trial. United States v. Short, 671 F. 2d 178, 183 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1119, 102 S.Ct. 2932, 73 L.Ed.2d 1332. In order to ensure that trials and not pretrial inquiries into the grand jury process resolve such challenges, the courts have attached a presumption of regularity to grand jury proceedings. See United States v. Woo…