ASSARSSON

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Sharpe, 470 U.S. 675 (U.S. 1985)
  …ify suppression. We granted the petition, vacated the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and remanded the case for further consideration in the light of the intervening decision in United States v. Ross, 456 U. S. 798 (1982). United States v. Sharpe, 457 U. S. 1127 (1982). [*681] On remand, a divided panel of the Court of Appeals again reversed the convictions. 712 F. 2d 65 (1983). The majority concluded that, in the light of Ross, it was required to “disavow” its alternative holding disapproving the warrant-l…
• United States v. Manbeck, 744 F.2d 360 (4th Cir. 1984)
  …the time limit for a permissible Terry stop and thereby became a de facto arrest. See Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968). Defendants rely upon Sharpe v. United States, 660 F. 2d 967 (4th Cir.1981), vacated and remanded, 457 U.S. 1127, 102 S.Ct. 2951, 73 L.Ed.2d 1345 (1982), modified, 712 F. 2d 65 (4th Cir.1983), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 3531, 82 L.Ed.2d 837 (1984), for the proposition that an investigatory stop may only be brief and certainly less than the time span in…
• Sharpe v. United States, 712 F.2d 65 (4th Cir. 1983)
  …ERVIN, Circuit Judge: The Supreme Court has vacated our decision in Sharpe v. United States, 660 F. 2d 967 (4th Cir.1981), and has remanded1 this case to us, 457 U.S. 1127,102 S.Ct. 2951, 73 L.Ed.2d 1345 (1982), with the direction that we reconsider it in light of United States v. Ross, 456 U.S. 798, 102 S.Ct. 2157, 72 L.Ed.2d 572 (1982). We have now done so. We conclude that by virtue of Ross, the decision of the Sup…