ECKERD DRUGS, INC., ET AL.

v.

BROWN ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Holsey v. Armour & Co., 743 F.2d 199 (4th Cir. 1984)
  …by the plaintiffs. Armour has not demonstrated any prejudice resulting from the intervenors’ metamorphosis from class member witnesses into plaintiffs. See Brown v. Eckerd Drugs, Inc., 663 F. 2d 1268, 1278 (4th Cir. 1981), vacated on other grounds, 457 U.S. 1128, 102 S.Ct. 2952, 73 L.Ed.2d 1345 (1982). Whether they were allowed or denied intervention, their testimony was relevant and the court would be justified in making factual findings and stating conclusions pertaining to the discrimination they depicte…
• Frolova v. Union OF Soviet Socialist Republics, 761 F.2d 370 (7th Cir. 1985)
  …district court’s jurisdiction when he was allegedly forcibly abducted and brutally tortured by American agents in Uruguay). . See Spiess v. C. Itoh & Co. (America), Inc., 643 F. 2d 353, 362-63 (5th Cir.1981) (Article 55), vacated on other grounds, 457 U.S. 1128, 102 S.Ct. 2951, 73 L.Ed.2d 1344 (1982); Filartiga v. Pena-Irala, 630 F. 2d 876, 881 (2d Cir.1980) (Articles 55 and 56); Hitai v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 343 F. 2d 466, 468 (2d Cir.1965) (Article 55); Camacho v. Rogers, 199 F.Supp. 1…
• O'Connor v. Peru State Coll., 781 F.2d 632 (8th Cir. 1986)
  …ng cross-examination causes the employer’s articulated reasons to fall from their own lack of credibility. Burdine, 450 U.S. at 255 n. 10, 101 S.Ct. at 1095; e.g., Brown v. Eckerd Drugs, 663 F. 2d 1268, 1272 (4th Cir.1981), vacated on other grounds, 457 U.S. 1128, 102 S.Ct. 2952, 73 L.Ed.2d 1345 (1982). O’Connor asserts that Peru State’s explanations for her discharge were unworthy of credence because, for example, the college at the February hearing relied on problems not attributable to her and on incide…