PENNHURST STATE SCHOOL AND HOSPITAL ET AL.

v.

HALDERMAN ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Pennhurst State Sch. & Hosp. v. Halderman, 465 U.S. 89 (U.S. 1984)
  …relief). See also id., at 661 (Aldisert, J., concurring) (seriously questioning the propriety of the order appointing the Special [*97] Master, but concluding that a retroactive reversal of that order would be meaningless).6 We granted certiorari, 457 U. S. 1131 (1982), and now reverse and remand. II Petitioners raise three challenges to the judgment of the Court of Appeals: (i) the Eleventh Amendment prohibited the District Court from ordering state officials to conform their conduct to state law; (ii) t…
• United States v. Grace, 461 U.S. 171 (U.S. 1983)
  …e as an unconstitutional restriction on First Amendment rights in a [*175] public place.4 Grace v. Burger, 214 U. S. App. D. C. 375, 665 F. 2d 1193 (1981). The Government appealed from the Court of Appeals’ judgment. We noted probable jurisdiction, 457 U. S. 1131 (1982). II Section 13k prohibits two distinct activities: it is unlawful either “to parade, stand, or move in processions or assemblages in the Supreme Court Building or grounds,” or “to display therein any flag, banner, or device designed or adap…
• United States v. Knotts, 460 U.S. 276 (U.S. 1983)
  …mendment because its use had violated respondent’s reasonable expectation of privacy, and that all information derived after the location of the cabin was a fruit of the illegal beeper monitoring.* 662 F. 2d 515 [*280] (1981). We granted certiorari, 457 U. S. 1131 (1982), and we now reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals. In Olmstead v. United States, 277 U. S. 438 (1928), this Court held that the wiretapping of a defendant’s private telephone line did not violate the Fourth Amendment because the wiret…