OIL TRANSPORT CO. ET AL.

v.

UNION OF TRANSPORTATION EMPLOYEES

Citator

Cited By (44 total)

• State v. Oliver, 442 So. 2d 1073 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
  …flict can be established on this basis, it will be a rare case in which an untested strategy will not look better than an unsuccessful one. 419 So. 2d at 1102 (quoting United States v. Benavidez, 664 F. 2d 1255, 1260-61 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1135, 102 S.Ct. 2963, 73 L.Ed.2d 1352 (1982)). Appellee did not demonstrate an actual conflict because she failed to show that the co-defendant Drayton gained significantly at her expense, and that she was damaged by the common defense. To the contrary,…
• United States v. Augustin Alvarez, 755 F.2d 830 (11th Cir. 1985)
  …on the predisposition of the defendant.” United States v. Dean, 666 F. 2d 174, 180 (5th Cir. Unit B 1982) (quoting United States v. Webster, 649 F. 2d 346, 348 (5th Cir.1981) (en banc)), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 1008, 102 S.Ct. 2300, 73 L.Ed.2d 1303, 457 U.S. 1135, 102 S.Ct. 2963, 73 L.Ed.2d 1353 (1983). To establish entrapment, the defendant must first present evidence of a prima facie ease by showing that the government conduct created “a substantial risk that the offense would be committed by a person othe…
• United States v. SUN Myung Moon and Takeru Kamiyama, 718 F.2d 1210 (2d Cir. 1983)
  …epeat the story about the BB shot, but it would violate Rule 606(b) to have her juxtapose the incident with her jury service and have her testify that it influenced her vote. See United States v. Beltempo, 675 F. 2d 472, 481 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1135, 102 S.Ct. 2936, 73 L.Ed.2d 1353 (1982). Without calling Torres the court had sufficient information from which it could conclude that there was no outside influence improperly brought to bear upon her, and that any supposed connection between the t…