WOODS, AKA EASON

v.

ILLINOIS

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Gary L. "Scott" Dickey, 736 F.2d 571 (10th Cir. 1984)
  …are being used in the operation, we will presume that the participants knew that they were part of a wide-ranging venture. See United States v. Hawkins, 661 F. 2d 436, 454 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 991, 102 S.Ct. 2274, 73 L.Ed.2d 1287, 457 U.S. 1137, 102 S.Ct. 2967, 73 L.Ed.2d 1355 (1982); United States v. Watson, supra at 1340. The fact that one alleged coconspirator was directly involved with only one type of drug will not reverse a finding of a single conspiracy to distribute drugs in violat…
• United States v. Garrett, 727 F.2d 1003 (11th Cir. 1984)
  …981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1136, 102 S.Ct. 2965, 73 L.Ed.2d 1354, 459 U.S. 906, 103 S.Ct. 208, 74 L.Ed.2d 166 (1982); United States v. Hawkins, 661 F. 2d 436, 453 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 991, 102 S.Ct. 2274, 73 L.Ed.2d 1287, 457 U.S. 1137, 102 S.Ct. 2967, 73 L.Ed.2d 1355, 459 U.S. 832, 103 S.Ct. 72, 74 L.Ed.2d 71 (1982); United States v. Zicree, 605 F. 2d 1381, 1389 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 966, 100 S.Ct. 1656, 64 L.Ed.2d 242 (1980); Tillman v. United States, 406 F. 2d…
• United States v. Haimowitz, 725 F.2d 1561 (11th Cir. 1984)
  …this issue before admitting the statements but rather, was allowed to admit the statements “subject to being connected up.” United States v. James, 590 F. 2d at 582. Accord, United States v. Hawkins, 661 F. 2d 436, 449 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1137, 102 S.Ct. 2967, 73 L.Ed.2d 1355 (1982). Furthermore, James does not require the district court to articulate the facts and reasons in support of its ruling. III. SCARBOROUGH Defendant Scarborough makes the following claims on appeal: 1) the dist…

  ← 1 / 2 →