MILTON S. LUBARR, D. D. S., APPELLANT,
v.
SAMUEL WALDMAN ET AL., APPELLEES
MILTON S. LUBARR, D. D. S., APPELLANT,
SAMUEL WALDMAN ET AL., APPELLEES
212 So. 2d 664
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1968)
Opinion of the Court
We have carefully reviewed the record on appeal and considered the briefs and *665arguments of counsel. We have concluded therefrom that, notwithstanding the court’s failure to consider the evidence in the light of § 55.56, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., then in effect,1 defendant’s evidence was sufficient to support the court’s finding in his favor. State Plant Board v. Smith, Fla.1959, 110 So.2d 401; Richards v. Samuel, Fla.App.1966, 184 So.2d 516. We further hold that appellant’s remaining points are without substantial merit. Central Hardware Co. v. Stampler, Fla.App.1965, 180 So.2d 205.
No harmful error having been made to appear, the judgment appealed is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- State Plant Bd. v. Walter A. Smith and wife, 110 So. 2d 401 (Fla. 1959)
- Cent. Hardware Co. v. Sydelle Stampler, 180 So. 2d 205 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965)
- Richards v. Samuel, 184 So. 2d 516 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966)