ENGLE, CORRECTIONAL SUPERINTENDENT
v.
ISAAC; PERINI, CORRECTIONAL SUPERINTENDENT V. BELL; AND ENGLE, CORRECTIONAL SUPERINTENDENT V. HUGHES
ENGLE, CORRECTIONAL SUPERINTENDENT
ISAAC; PERINI, CORRECTIONAL SUPERINTENDENT V. BELL; AND ENGLE, CORRECTIONAL SUPERINTENDENT V. HUGHES
457 U.S. 1141
Supreme Court of the United States (1982)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Knight v. Dugger, 863 F.2d 705 (11th Cir. 1988)…ct appeal, a federal court will usually be barred from reviewing a claim of error based thereon. See generally Engle v. Isaac, 456 U.S. 107, 71 L.Ed.2d 783, 102 S.Ct. 1558, reh. den., [456 U.S. 1001] 73 L.Ed.2d 1296, 102 S.Ct. 2283 [2286] reh. den. [457 U.S. 1141] 73 L.Ed.2d 1361, 102 S.Ct. 2976 (1982); United States v. Frady, 456 U.S. 152, 71 L.Ed.2d 816, 102 S.Ct. 1584 (1982); Wainwright v. Sykes, 433 U.S. 72 [53 L.Ed.2d 594] 97 S.Ct. 2497 (1977); Washington v. Estelle, 648 F. 2d 276 (5th Cir.1981), cert.…
-
Bacik v. Engle, 706 F.2d 169 (6th Cir. 1983)…e that the decision of the district court denying habeas corpus must be affirmed on authority of Engle v. Isaac, 456 [*171] U.S. 107, 102 S.Ct. 1558, 71 L.Ed.2d 783 (1982), rehearing denied, 456 U.S. 1001, 102 S.Ct. 2286, 73 L.Ed.2d 1296 (1982), and 457 U.S. 1141, 102 S.Ct. 2976, 73 L.Ed.2d 1361 (1982), construing Wainwright v. Sykes, 433 U.S. 72, 97 S.Ct. 2497, 53 L.Ed.2d 594 (1977). See Fornash v. Marshall, 686 F. 2d 1179 (6th Cir., 1982); Henderson v. Jago, 681 F. 2d 471 (6th Cir. 1982). See also: Thomas…