ADAMS ET AL.

v.

HOWERTON, ACTING DISTRICT DIRECTOR, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE

Citator

Cited By (52 total)

• Harvard v. State, 486 So. 2d 537 (Fla. 1986)
  …ve, Songer, 769 F. 2d at 1489 (citing Eddings v. Oklahoma, 455 U.S. 104, 118, 102 S.Ct. 869, 878, 7 L.Ed.2d 1 (1982); Jordan v. Arizona, 438 U.S. 911, 98 S.Ct. 3138, 57 L.Ed.2d 1157 (1978); Spivey v. Zant, 661 F. 2d 464 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 458 U.S. 1111, 102 S.Ct. 3495, 73 L.Ed.2d 1374 (1982)), Songer is entitled to a new sentencing hearing. A majority of that court ruled the case should be remanded to the trial judge for resentencing to permit Songer the opportunity to [*539] present nonstatutory…
• Miami-Dade Police Dep't v. Martinez, 838 So. 2d 672 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)
  …of undue pressure by the officers, there is nothing to support the trial court’s finding that the officers' presence resulted in a "coercive and misleading atmosphere.” Compare United States v. Gillespie, 650 F. 2d 127 (7th Cir. 1981), cert, denied, 458 U.S. 1111, 102 S.Ct. 3495, 73 L.Ed.2d 1374 (1981)(no voluntary consent where defendant confronted at his door by five FBI agents and police officers with drawn shotguns and revolvers, stating that they were looking for fugitives); Norman v. State, 379 So. 2d…
• Ross v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 81 (U.S. 1988)
  …her the composition of the jury panel as a whole could possibly have been affected by the trial court’s error.’” 481 U. S., at 665 (emphasis in original) (quoting Moore v. Estelle, 670 F. 2d 56, 58 (CA5) (specially concurring opinion), cert. denied, 458 U. S. 1111 (1982)). Petitioner points out that had he not used his sixth peremptory challenge to remove Huling, he could have removed another juror, including one who ultimately sat on the jury. Petitioner asserts, moreover, that had he used his sixth perempt…

  ← 1 / 2 →