HARVEY ET AL.

v.

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ET AL.; THOMPSON V. WOLTENBERG; NIEVES V. UNITED STATES; BOARD OF EDUCATION OF ROGERS, ARKANSAS, ET AL. V. MCCLUSKEY, BY HIS NEXT FRIEND, MCCLUSKEY; HUNT V. COLLINS; DYKEMA ET AL. V. UNITED STATES ET AL.; FIALA V. VILLAGE OF CARPENTERSVILLE; YEO V. MICHIGAN; RUPPEL V. UNITED STATES; BERGER V. UNITED STATES ET AL.; NIEMI V. NATIONAL BROADCASTING CO., INC., ET AL.; BREWER V. INDIANA; HYMAN V. SOUTH CAROLINA; MASELLI V. STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION OF CALIFORNIA; PASCHAL V. FLORIDA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RELATIONS COMMISSION ET AL.; BLACK V. EAST OHIO GAS CO. ET AL.; HARRINGTON V. TENNESSEE; HOOVER V. MISSISSIPPI; RITTER V. RITTER; NEUSTEIN V. UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES EX REL. MILLER V. MCCARTHY, SUPERINTENDENT, CALIFORNIA MEN'S COLONY, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Orrin Shaid, Jr., 730 F.2d 225 (5th Cir. 1984)
  …ited States v. Shelton, 669 F. 2d 446 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 934, 102 S.Ct. 1989, 72 L.Ed.2d 454; and United States v. Benmuhar, 658 F. 2d 14 (1st Cir.1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1117, 102 S.Ct. 2927, 73 L.Ed.2d 1328, reh’g denied, 458 U.S. 1132, 103 S.Ct. 16, 73 L.Ed.2d 1402. In a related argument, appellant contends that consecutive sentences on counts one through seven constitute cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the eighth amendment. This contention is frivolous. The able an…
• Cont'l Cas. Co. v. Cole, 809 F.2d 891 (D.C. Cir. 1987)
  …to this court (673 F. 2d 550 (D.C.Cir.1982)), requested a rehearing en banc, petitioned to the Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari (457 U.S. 1120, 102 S.Ct. 2934, 73 L.Ed.2d 1333 (1982)) and for a rehearing of the denial of a writ of certiorari (458 U.S. 1132, 103 S.Ct. 17, 73 L.Ed.2d 1403 (1982)), all without success. C & G opposed Berger at each juncture, without assistance from Continental. In 1979, Continental filed suit seeking a declaratory judgment on the issue of its duty to defend C & G in the…