BUTCHER

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Sonsearaharay Polk v. Yellow Freight Sys., Inc., 801 F.2d 190 (6th Cir. 1986)
  …aise them in its answer, defendant waived its right to assert these defenses. As defendant notes, however, the Supreme Court’s decision in Kremer v. Chemical Constr. Corp., 456 U.S. 461, 481-82, 102 S.Ct. 1883, 1897-98, 72 L.Ed.2d 262, reh’g denied, 458 U.S. 1133, 103 S.Ct. 20, 73 L.Ed.2d 1405 (1982), interpreting the scope and effect of the Full Faith and Credit Statute, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1738, was not decided until after the defendant’s answer was filed. Defendant included the preclusion issue in the final pre…
• Kelley v. TYK Refractories Co., 860 F.2d 1188 (3d Cir. 1988)
  …itle YII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (1982 & Supp.1986), to give preclusive effect to a state court decision reviewing a state administrative agency’s determination of an employment discrimination claim), reh’g denied, 458 U.S. 1133, 103 S.Ct. 20, 73 L.Ed.2d 1405 (1982). Assuming the constitutional adequacy of the state proceedings in this case, we are therefore required to give the Unemployment Compensation Review Board’s factfinding the same preclusive effect to which it woul…
• Penn v. Attorney Gen. OF THE State OF Ala., 930 F.2d 838 (11th Cir. 1991)
  …unty code was declared unconstitutional because Penn suffered no constitutional harm. Therefore, he has no standing to challenge the constitutionality of section 311. Clements v. Fashing, 457 U.S. 957, 102 S.Ct. 2836, 73 L.Ed.2d 508, reh’g. denied, 458 U.S. 1133, 103 S.Ct. 20, 73 L.Ed.2d 1404 (1982). The only difference between section 350 and section 311 is that under section 311 female delinquents between the ages of sixteen and eighteen years of age were under the exclusive jurisdiction of the Jefferson…