FORD

v.

U-HAUL COMPANY OF LOS ANGELES ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (52 total)

• Fountaine v. State, 460 So. 2d 553 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)
  …h amendment privilege against self-incrimination, nor does it give a defendant the right to demand that the government shield a witness from the consequences of his own testimony. United States v. Chagra, 669 F. 2d 241, 260 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 846, 103 S.Ct. 102, 74 L.Ed.2d 92 (1982). Rather, the compulsory process clause holds only that the government may not act to prevent an otherwise willing witness from testifying for the defense. United States v. Lenz, 616 F. 2d 960 (6th Cir.), cert. de…
• State v. Montgomery, 467 So. 2d 387 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
  …Turkish, 623 F. 2d at 776-77. For these reasons, it is generally held that the balancing of interests concerning who and when to prosecute should be left to the executive branch. United States v. Chagra, 669 F. 2d 241, 261 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 846, 103 S.Ct. 102, 74 L.Ed.2d 92 (1982). See also Thevis; Turkish. Courts have also rejected the view expressed in Virgin Islands that the compulsory process clause gives a defendant the right to request that judicial immunity be granted his witnesses…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Harrelson, 754 F.2d 1153 (5th Cir. 1985)
  …led in appellant’s case. Id. at 1000-01. If the government succeeds in doing so, the conviction will stand despite appellant’s showing of adverse pretrial publicity. Id. at 1001. United States v. Chagra, 669 F. 2d 241, 250 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 846, 103 S.Ct. 102, 74 L.Ed.2d 92 (1982). [*1160] Assuming, as we do for purposes of analysis, that such community saturation existed here, we have carefully examined the voir dire conducted by the court of the twelve jurors and two alternates. The exam…

  ← 1 / 3 →