LONG

v.

BALKCOM, WARDEN, GEORGIA STATE PRISON

Citator

Cited By (17 total)

• United States v. Pepe, 747 F.2d 632 (11th Cir. 1984)
  …ision,” United States v. McMahon, 592 F. 2d 871, 876 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 921, 99 S.Ct. 2847, 61 L.Ed.2d 289 (1979); nor was it cumulative or confusing to the jury. United States v. Tunsil, 672 F. 2d 879, 881 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 850, 103 S.Ct. 110, 74 L.Ed.2d 98 (1982). The trial judge clearly acted within his discretion in admitting the evidence.75 2. Testimony Concerning the “Burly Men” from Las Vegas The district court admitted testimony which showed that the partners ha…
• United States v. Hewes, 729 F.2d 1302 (11th Cir. 1984)
  …rinsic offense evidence rests in the sound discretion of the trial court, and an appellate court may reverse that decision only if it constituted a clear abuse of discretion. United States v. Tunsil, 672 F. 2d 879, 880 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 850, 103 S.Ct. 110, 74 L.Ed.2d 98 (1983). The nature of the inquiry that the first prong of the Beechum-Roe test requires depends on the issue to which the government claims the extrinsic evidence is relevant. See Beechum, 582 F. 2d at 911-12 n. 15. Mo…
• United States v. Frank Church, 955 F.2d 688 (11th Cir. 1992)
  …the other side of the balancing, showing a willingness to facilitate the murder a prosecutor is the type of extrinsic act likely to incite a jury to an irrational decision. See United States v. Tunsil, 672 F. 2d 879, 881 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 850, 103 S.Ct. 110, 74 L.Ed.2d 98 (1982). In United States v. Hewes, 729 F. 2d 1302, 1315 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1110, 105 S.Ct. 790, 83 L.Ed.2d 783 (1985), we noted that “such irrationality is the primary target of Rule 403.” Further…