KNOTT

v.

MABRY, DIRECTOR, ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION

Citator

Cited By

• Burt Beavers v. A.L. Lockhart, 755 F.2d 657 (8th Cir. 1985)
  …o state court and present these allegations. This court has faced this situation before and has held, under analogous circumstances, that the petitioner had exhausted his state remedies. Knott v. Mabry, 671 F. 2d 1208, 1210 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 851, 103 S.Ct. 115, 74 L.Ed.2d 101 (1982); Witham v. Mabry, 596 F. 2d 293, 299 n. 7 (8th Cir.1979). Because Beavers has exhausted his state remedies, we may properly consider his arguments on the merits. B. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel. Beavers’…
• Vasquez v. A.L. Lockhart, 867 F.2d 1056 (8th Cir. 1988)
  …udice test of Wainwright v. Sykes, 433 U.S. 72, 97 S.Ct. 2497, 53 L.Ed.2d 594 (1977), to conclude that it was procedurally barred from reviewing his ineffective assistance claim. Vasquez cites Knott v. Mabry, 671 F. 2d 1208 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 851, 103 S.Ct. 115, 74 L.Ed.2d 101 (1982), to support his assertion that the “deliberate bypass” test of Fay v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391, 83 S.Ct. 822, 9 L.Ed.2d 837 (1963), should apply instead because of his pro se status in the state post-conviction procee…
• Rogers v. Israel, 746 F.2d 1280-1288 (7th Cir. 1984)
  …circumstances, “it may be vital in affording effective representation to a defendant in a criminal case for counsel to elicit expert testimony rebutting the state’s expert testimony.” Knott v. Mabry, 671 F. 2d 1208, 1212-13 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 851, 103 S.Ct. 115, 74 L.Ed.2d 101 (1982). Cf. Williams v. Martin, 618 F. 2d 1021, 1027 (4th Cir.1980) (where substantial question requiring expert testimony arose over the cause of victim’s death, trial judge’s refusal to provide expert deprived defe…