MCCULLEY ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Obregon, 748 F.2d 1371 (10th Cir. 1984)
  …xpectation of privacy in the car he was driving and therefore he did not have standing to challenge the stop and later search of the car by the New Mexico State Police. See also United States v. McCulley, 673 F. 2d 346 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 852, 103 S.Ct. 116, 74 L.Ed.2d 102 (1982), in which the court held that two codefendants lacked standing to challenge the warrant-less search of an unoccupied automobile rented by another codefendant; United States v. McConnell, 500 F. 2d 347 (5th Cir.1…
• United States v. Rivera, 775 F.2d 1559 (11th Cir. 1985)
  …ogether should be tried together. United States v. Harper, 680 F. 2d 731, 733 (11th Cir.) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 916, 103 S.Ct. 229, 74 L.Ed.2d 182 (1982); United States v. McCulley, 673 F. 2d 346, 349 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 852, 103 S.Ct. 116, 74 L.Ed.2d 102 (1982) ; United States v. Kabbaby, 672 F. 2d 857, 861 (11th Cir.1982). Here there was no confusion of evidence between the two defendants. Rivera’s “spill over” argument is imaginative and unsupported in light of the f…
• United States v. Darwin, 757 F.2d 1193 (11th Cir. 1985)
  …rt the verdict is frivolous. VI. Consolidating the two indictments for trial was not fundamentally unfair. A decision to consolidate will not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion. See U.S. v. McCulley, 673 F. 2d 346 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 852, 103 S.Ct. 116, 74 L.Ed.2d 102 (1982). No abuse or unfairness occurred here where the two indictments were closely related, see U.S. v. Scott, 659 F. 2d 585 (5th Cir.1981) (Unit B), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 854, 103 S.Ct. 121, 74 L.Ed.2d 105 (1982), a…