SANZO

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (41 total)

• Metro. Dade Cnty. Fair Hous. & Emp. Appeals Bd. v. Sunrise Vill. Mobile Home Park, Inc., 485 So. 2d 865 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)
  …le residential facilities and to prevent the creation of age ghettos from which neither the elderly nor, as here, the more youthful may be excluded. Marina Point, Ltd. v. Wolfson, 30 Cal.3d 721, 180 Cal.Rptr. 496, 640 P. 2d 115 (1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 858, 103 S.Ct. 129, 74 L.Ed.2d 111 (1982). On these bases, numerous jurisdictions, either by specific legislation, judicial interpretation of general statutory provisions, or both, have determined to preclude age discrimination in a variety of context…
• United States v. Young, 745 F.2d 733 (2d Cir. 1984)
  …L.Ed.2d 128, 128, 261 (1983). It is equally well-settled that because “[a] conspiracy by its very nature is a secretive operation”, United States v. Provenzano, 615 F. 2d 37, 45 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 446 U.S. 953, 100 S.Ct. 2921, 64 L.Ed.2d 810, 459 U.S. 858 (1980), and because intent and knowledge are subjective facts, see United States v. Sheiner, 410 F. 2d 337, 340 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 396 U.S. 825, 859, 90 S.Ct. 68, 127, 24 L.Ed.2d 76, 110 (1969), the “[existence of and participation in a conspi…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Murad Nersesian, 824 F.2d 1294 (2d Cir. 1987)
  …v. Sheiner, 410 F. 2d 337, 340 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 825, 90 S.Ct. 68, 24 L.Ed.2d 76 (1969) (quoting Anderson v. United States, 270 F. 2d 124, 127 (6th Cir.1959)); accord United States v. Sanzo, 673 F. 2d 64, 69 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 858, 103 S.Ct. 128, 74 L.Ed.2d 111 (1982). “[A] finding of knowledge that is largely inferential is not impermissible.” Sheiner, 410 F. 2d at 340. Although the evidence does permit the inference that Maktabi did not know of the reporting requirements,…