SWIFT AGRICULTURAL CHEMICALS CORP.

v.

FARMLAND INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (17 total)

• Bundy v. State, 455 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 1984)
  …e scientifically recognized dangers of unreliability of such testimony outweigh its probative value as a matter of law, or for a combination of such reasons. See, e.g., People v. Shirley, 31 Cal.3d 18, 641 P. 2d 775, 181 Cal.Rptr. 243, cert. denied, 459 U.S. 860, 103 S.Ct. 133, 74 L.Ed.2d 114 (1982); People v. Gonzales, 415 Mich. 615, 329 N.W. 2d 743 (1982); State v. Mack, 292 N.W. 2d 764 (Minn.1980). The courts of other jurisdictions have held that hypnotically aided testimony is admissible, but only if c…
• Stokes v. State, 548 So. 2d 188 (Fla. 1989)
  …ese states decided that hypnotically refreshed testimony was, by its nature, too unreliable for use in the courtroom. By the time the California Supreme Court decided People v. Shirley, 31 Cal.3d 18, 181 Cal.Rptr. 243, 723 P. 2d 1354, cert. denied, 459 U.S. 860, 103 S.Ct. 133, 74 L.Ed.2d 114 (1982), scientific opinion on the use of hypnotically refreshed memory in court had changed dramatically. Although the courts in some states had already reached the conclusion that hypnotically refreshed testimony was…
• Flanagan v. State, 586 So. 2d 1085 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)
  …n was in keeping with the following observations made in the court’s earlier opinion in People v. Shirley, 31 Cal.Sd 18, 51-54, 723 P. 2d 1354, 1374-75, 181 Cal.Rptr. 243, 264, stay denied, 458 U.S. 1125, 103 S.Ct. 13, 73 L.Ed.2d 1400, cert. denied, 459 U.S. 860, 103 S.Ct. 133, 74 L.Ed.2d 114 (1982):21 Nor are those techniques necessarily limited to manipulation of physical evidence: we do not doubt that if testimony based on a new scientific process operating on purely psychological evidence were to be of…