TOMARGO

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (29 total)

• Chauncey L. Moore, Jr. v. The Marketplace Rest., Inc., 754 F.2d 1336 (7th Cir. 1985)
  …84); McKenzie v. Lamb, 738 F. 2d 1005, 1008 (9th Cir.1984); Giordano v. Lee, 434 F. 2d 1227, 1230 (8th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 931, 91 S.Ct. 2250, 29 L.Ed.2d 709 (1971); cf. Garris v. Rowland, 678 F. 2d 1264, 1270 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 864, 103 S.Ct. 143, 74 L.Ed.2d 121 (1982). Therefore, under the circumstances of this case it is proper for the jury to consider all the evidence, including questions regarding the sufficiency of the deputies’ investigation at the scene, in determining…
• United States v. LEE, 743 F.2d 1240 (8th Cir. 1984)
  …tates v. Alberti, 727 F. 2d 1055, 1059 (11th Cir.1984); United States v. Lee, 694 F. 2d 649, 652 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1086, 103 S.Ct. 1779, 76 L.Ed.2d 350 (1983); United States v. Tamargo, 672 F. 2d 887, 889 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 864, 103 S.Ct. 141, 74 L.Ed.2d 119 (1982). The existence of the agreement may be proved by circumstantial evidence. Proof is not required that a defendant have knowledge of all the details of the conspiracy; rather, only knowledge of its essential obj…
• United States v. Roman, 728 F.2d 846 (7th Cir. 1984)
  …ual consumption, we find that a jury could reasonably conclude that the delivery of such large quantities clearly indicated an intent to further distribute the L.S.D. See United [*859] States v. Tamargo, 672 F. 2d 887, 890 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 864, 103 S.Ct. 141, 74 L.Ed.2d 119 (1982); and United States v. Fleming, 677 F. 2d 602, 609 (7th Cir.1982). The defendant makes an even more basic argument by asserting that there is no evidence that the items delivered to him by Justman were in fact L…