MIRKIN

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Stall v. State, 570 So. 2d 257 (Fla. 1990)
  …speech interests requires a compelling state interest test. See Gardner v. Bradenton Herald, Inc., 413 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla.) (citing Smith v. Daily Mail Publishing Co., 443 U.S. 97, 101-02, 99 S.Ct. 2667, 2669-70, 61 L.Ed.2d 399 (1979), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 865, 103 S.Ct. 143, 74 L.Ed.2d 121 (1982). Moreover, the right of free speech itself is explicitly concerned at least with some kinds of privacy interests, particularly in the arena of obscenity law. E.g., Keaton, 371 So. 2d at 91 (citing Stanley, 394 U…
• State v. Globe Commc'ns Corp., 622 So. 2d 1066 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)
  …l penalties were insufficient to justify actual and potential encroach [*1072] ments on freedom of speech and freedom of the press which resulted from applying the statute. In Gardner v. Bradenton Herald, Inc., 413 So2d 10 (Fla.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 865 [, 103 S.Ct. 143, 74 L.Ed.2d 121] (1982), the Court considered a first amendment challenge to Fla.Stat. 934.-091 (1927) making it a third-degree felony for any person to publish in a newspaper, publication or electronic medium the name of any person…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• S. Hampton Co. v. Stinnes Corp., 733 F.2d 1108 (5th Cir. 1984)
  …uch a claim requires proof of present intent not to perform a future promise. Foster v. Reed, 623 S.W. 2d 494, 495-96 (Tex.Civ.App.1981). . Dura-Wood. Treating Co. v. Century Forest Industries, Inc., 675 F. 2d 745, 754 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 865, 103 S.Ct. 144, 74 L.Ed.2d 122, appeal after remand 694 F. 2d 112 (1983); General Supply & Equipment Co., Inc. v. Phillips, 490 S.W. 2d 913, 920 (Tex.Civ.App.1973), writ ref. n.r.e. . LaCaze v. Olendorff, 526 F. 2d 1213, 1220 (5th Cir.1976); Smith…