ROYSTER

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Coates v. Johnson & Johnson, 756 F.2d 524 (7th Cir. 1985)
  …d be inconsistent with the principle that the plaintiffs in a Title VII case retain the ultimate burden of persuasion on the issue of discrimination. See Segar, 738 F. 2d at 1284; Clark v. Chrysler Corp., 673 F. 2d 921, 929 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 873, 103 S.Ct. 161, 74 L.Ed.2d 134 (1982). Plaintiffs should not be able to shift the burden of persuasion by alleging that some factor in defendant’s control has been used by the defendant discriminatorily. A defendant that uses a possibly biased exp…
• Forrest F. McCLUNEY v. JOS. Schlitz Brewing Co., 728 F.2d 924 (7th Cir. 1984)
  …t court placed the proper burden of proof upon McClu-ney? “It is the plaintiff’s burden under Title YII to demonstrate discrimination by the preponderance of the evidence.” Clark v. Chrysler Corporation, 673 F. 2d 921, 926 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 873, 103 S.Ct. 161, 74 L.Ed.2d 134 (1982), citing Furnco Construction Corporation v. Waters, 438 U.S. 567, 98 S.Ct. 2943, 57 L.Ed.2d 957 (1978); see also Sonia v. Ozinga Bros., Inc., 704 F. 2d 990, 997 (7th Cir.1983); Sherkow, 630 F. 2d at 502. At the…
• Shidaker v. Carlin, 782 F.2d 746 (7th Cir. 1986)
  …d the composition of the group occupying the positions in question can, by itself, make a prima facie case of disparate impact. Mozee v. Jeffboat, 746 F. 2d 365, 372 (7th Cir.1984); Clark v. Chrysler, 673 F. 2d 921, 927 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 873, 103 S.Ct. 161, 74 L.Ed.2d 134 (1982) ; Movement for Opportunity and Equality v. General Motors, 622 F. 2d 1235, 1244-45 (7th Cir.1980); See also, Hazelwood School District v. United States, 433 U.S. 299, 97 S.Ct. 2736, 53 L.Ed.2d 768 (1977). Where…