PERRY

v.

CARLSON, DIRECTOR, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Atonio v. Wards Cove Packing Co., Inc., 810 F.2d 1477 (9th Cir. 1987)
  …ncy v. Prudential Insurance Co., 668 F. 2d 795 (5th Cir. 1982); Griffin v. Board of Regents, 795 F. 2d 1281, 1288-89 and n. 14 (7th Cir.1986) (refusing to apply impact analysis); contra Clark v. Chrysler Corp., 673 F. 2d 921 (7th Cir.) cert. denied, 459 U.S. 873, 103 S.Ct. 161, 74 L.Ed.2d 134 (1982); Talley v. United States Postal Service, 720 F. 2d 505 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 952, 104 S.Ct. 2155, 80 L.Ed.2d 541 (1984); Harris v. Ford Motor Co., 651 F. 2d 609 (8th Cir.1981) (refusing to apply…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• Citizens Council OF Del. Cnty. v. Brinegar, 741 F.2d 584 (3d Cir. 1984)
  …chosen by Congress is respected, we no longer follow a rigid, semantic approach to statutory construction, lest we construe a statute within its letter, but beyond Congress’ intent. United States v. Rabb, 680 F. 2d 294, 296 (3d Cir.), cert, denied, 459 U.S. 873, 103 S.Ct. 162, 74 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982). We thus examine legislative history to determine Congress’ specific intent with respect to this issue. A key colloquy between Senator DeConeini, a sponsor of the Senate bill, and Representative Kastenmeier, ch…
• BOX v. A & P TEA Co., 772 F.2d 1372 (7th Cir. 1985)
  …omotion[s] with less seniority than myself.” Without these handwritten additions, Box’s sex discrimination case would clearly lie outside the parameters of her EEOC complaint. See Clark v. Chrysler Corp., 673 F. 2d 921, 931 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 873, 103 S.Ct. 161, 74 L.Ed.2d 134 (1982). We need not, and do not, decide whether a check-mark of the sex discrimination box, by itself, is sufficient to raise a sex discrimination claim in an EEOC charge. Here Box made the checkmark in the “sex” box…