MOORE

v.

MOORE

Citator

Cited By (50 total)

• B.S. v. State, 548 So. 2d 838 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)
  …quest” or invitation. See 2 W. LaFave, Search & Seizure § 5.1(a), at 391, and cases collected at nn. 26-28; State v. Ostroski, 186 Conn. 287, 291, 440 A. 2d 984, 986 (1982) (defendant told he “should come in tonight”; deemed coercive), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 878, 103 S.Ct. 173, 74 L.Ed.2d 142; United States v. Allen, 436 A. 2d 1303, 1309 (D.C.App.1981) (defendant told “you have to come to homicide with us”; deemed coercive). Again, the fact that it is a juvenile who is told that adult officers “want” her to…
• Mitchell v. State, 580 So. 2d 852 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)
  …g that an outstanding defense subpoena was unserved exacerbates our concern to the extent that we determine that the stringent criteria set out for the granting of such a continuance in Dickerson v. Alabama, 667 F. 2d 1364 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 878, 103 S.Ct. 173, 74 L.Ed.2d 142 (1982), in this case has been met. We, therefore, reverse and remand this case for a new trial. RYDER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON, J., concur.…
• Durham Eldon Stokes v. Singletary, 952 F.2d 1567 (11th Cir. 1992)
  …e state appellate opinion “fail[ed] to include several legally significant facts,” and thus these factual determinations were not “fairly supported by the record.” Dickerson v. Alabama, 667 F. 2d 1364, 1368 (11th Cir.) (citing Mata I), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 878, 103 S.Ct. 173, 74 L.Ed.2d 142 (1982). “Factual issues involve ‘what are termed basic, primary, or historical facts: facts “in the sense of a recital of external events and the credibility of their narrators....’”” Hance, 696 F. 2d at 946-47 (quotin…