NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INS. CO.

v.

BROOKER

Citator

Cited By

• Dadeland Depot, Inc. v. ST. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 945 So. 2d 1216 (Fla. 2006)
  …1 Cal.W.L.Rev. 128 (1984) ] at 137. The liability of a surety is coextensive with that of the principal. Cone v. Benjamin, 150 Fla. 419, 8 So. 2d 476 (1942); National Union Fire Ins. Co. v. Robuck, 203 So. 2d 204 (Fla. 1st DCA 1967), cert. denied, 212 So. 2d 869 (Fla.1968). However, the surety’s liability for damages is limited by the terms of the bond. Cone; Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Sholtz, 123 Fla. 837, 168 So. 25 (1935). Florida courts have long recognized that the liability of a surety should not be ex…
• Am. Home Assurance Co. v. Larkin Gen. Hosp., Ltd., 593 So. 2d 195 (Fla. 1992)
  …ctor defaults. Sobel, supra, at 137. The liability of a surety is coextensive with that of the principal. Cone v. Benjamin, 150 Fla. 419, 8 So. 2d 476 (1942); National Union Fire Ins. Co. v. Robuck, 203 So. 2d 204 (Fla. 1st DCA 1967), cert. denied, 212 So. 2d 869 (Fla.1968). However, the surety’s liability for damages is limited by the terms of the bond. Cone; Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Sholtz, 123 Fla. 837, 168 So. 25 (1935). Florida courts have long'recognized that the liability of a surety should not be ex…
• McDONALD v. McGOWAN, 402 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981)
  …s a question of credibility of witnesses, the issue of implied [*1201] notice should be determined by the trier of fact. Kilburn v. Davenport, 286 So. 2d 241 (Fla.3d DCA 1973); See McCausland v. Davis, 204 So. 2d 334 (Fla.2d DCA 1967), cert. denied, 212 So. 2d 869 (Fla.1968); Applefield v. Commercial Standard, Ins. Co., 176 So. 2d 366 (Fla.2d DCA), cert. denied, 183 So. 2d 209 (Fla.1965). III. INTERFERENCE WITH A CONTRACT RIGHT The tort of interference with a contract right, similar to interference with a b…

Authorities Cited

• Wright v. State, 207 So. 2d 486 (Fla. 1st DCA 1968)